How to count...

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

How to count...

by Puddin'

As a writer, you're meant to put words on blank paper. Accountants, on the other hand, are paid to put arabic numbers on paper with lines on it, which makes all the difference. Arabic numbers are not words, they're symbols, which don't actually translate all that well into real words. There are a whole set of rules that are absolutely mandatory when writers write using numbers, mostly to avoid confusion, but also to avoid looking like a rank amateur. The two instantly diagnostic symptoms of amateur writing are bad spelling, and the inappropriate use of arabic numerals.

The first thing a writer has to know about arabic numbers is that they're not precise, even though they look like they ought to be, and it's usually important for a writer to get the words right all the time. If you write: "Sam said, ‘It's 7:00,’" what the heck did Sam actually say? "Seven?" "Seven o'clock?" "Sevenish?" "Seven on the dot?" "Seven exactly?" "Seven AM?" "Seven PM?"" "Seven in the early evening?" "Seven in the morning?" "Oh seven hundred military time?" Those bare arabic symbols say nothing at all beyond what an accountant might dream of, and leaving important details as an exercise for the reader is rarely a good idea.

Every professional writing venue has what's called a "style guide" which details many of the rules associated with putting words on paper for that particular venue. Newspapers have style guides, as do magazines, as do book publishers, as do many web sites. This article addresses only the use of numbers, and offers explanations, which is rather more than most style guides do, since the typical response to submissions which don't follow the rules is to toss them into the trash.

Number Styles

Rule One — Spell out every isolated single-digit whole number. Arabic numerals should be used for large numbers, exact times, exact amounts, and certain other specific situations, but the exact point at which numbers become “large” varies. Some venues treat ten as a large number, but see rule two.

Correct Examples: The two of us went to town. I have 10,763 unique clips in my paperclip collection.

Rule Two — Be consistent. If you have a lot of small numbers that you spell out, and a very few larger numbers, you might consider spelling out every number. An exception may be made for extremmely large numbers, in which one may mix arabic numbers and spelled-out large portions of numbers, to spare your readers the difficulty of counting zeros. Likewise, if you have a lot of large numbers, which might use arabic numerals, you might consider using arabic numbers for everything, as long as you stick to one general topic, but see rule three.

Correct examples: One potato, two potato, three potato, four. I have forty-seven potatoes in all. The US military budget is $663.8 billion.

Incorrect example: The three of us carried 12 pounds each.

What consistency might be in any given instance may also depend on how you start out, but may be modified by other, less flexible rules.

Correct example: Whilst on my trip to the Moon, I collected 739 specimens of dust, 283 rocks, and 2 golf balls.

Incorrect Example: I’d ordered six eggs, but was given 66 eggs.

Rule Three — Never start a sentence with an arabic numeral.

Incorrect Example: 17 of us are astronomers.

Note that there are no "capital" arabic numbers, and it always looks stupid to start a sentence without a capital letter in English. If you have to use arabic numbers, for whatever reason, you either have to reword the sentence to put real words first or spell out the initial number, even if it’s ‘large.’

Correct example: Seventeen of us are astronomers.

Correct example: We're all astronomers, 17,639 of us.

Rule Four — Always spell out simple fractions and hyphenate them to make life easier for your readers. Unless consistency dictates otherwise, use ‘half,’ ‘a third,’ or other simple spelled-out fraction for common fractions.

Correct examples: We ate half the pies. Two-thirds of us were involved in the effort. A tenth of us were left behind. Three-quarters of the volunteers weren’t quite sober. An eighth of the men weren't qualified as yodelling cowboys.

Rule Five — Mixed fractions should be written as arabic figures unless, as dictated by Rule Three, it begins a sentence. Never use special glyphs for mixed fractions, like ¼, ½, or ¾, unless they are the only vulgar fractions used in a document, because this would violate Rule Two, which is all about consistency. Note that ¼ looks nothing like 1/5. Also, these special glyphs aren’t available in all fonts, nor are they guaranteed to exist at all, so your document may wind up with these characters looking either ‘odd,’ or invisible, on other people’s computers, if you use them at all.

Correct examples: The interest rate on secured deposits is 3 1/2 percent. Seven and one-half percent is the maximum you can expect on unsecured money-market accounts. Note that these two correct sentences would none-the-less violate the consistency required by Rule Two if they appeared in the same paragraph or talked about the same subject in a single document.

Incorrect example: Take 1 ¼ cup flour, then add 2 1/3 cup sugar, and mix slowly into 1 7/8 gallon of water.

Rule Six — Simple is better. If a number is ‘round,’ especially if it’s an explicit or implied approximation, spell it out. Arabic numbers tend to imply a precision which may not exist.

Correct examples: Into the valley of death rode the six hundred. Ali Baba and the forty thieves hid in the cave. There were hundreds of casualties. Almost fifty arrows hit the target.

Incorrect examples: We had 12s of eggs and didn’t know what to do with them. A few 100 bicyclists rode by the grandstand.

Rule Seven — Always use arabic numbers to express decimal numbers, and note that this implies precision. Put a single zero in front of a decimal number unless the decimal number begins with a zero.

Correct examples: Under the Rules of Golf, a golf ball weighs no more than 1.62 ounces (45.93 grams). The Euler-Mascheroni constant is approximately 0.577. There were only .07 parts per million of arsenic in the sample.

Incorrect example: Roughly 3.77 Girl Guides were assigned to sell cookies.

Rule Eight — In general, use arabic numbers for the days and years in dates, although they can be spelled out for stylistic reasons. Dates tend to look more formal when spelled out, and this is often done for formal invitations, as to a wedding. One can add ordinal indications if desired.

Correct examples: August 7th fell on a Saturday in 1909. January 9, 2007. December 21st, 1945. The 20th of November. June 2nd. You are cordially invited to Tea on October Fourth, Nineteen Hundred and Twelve.

Rule Nine — In running text, the time of day should always be spelled out, unless extreme precision is implied. If you use the idiom, ‘o’clock,’ the time must always be spelled out.

Correct examples: Dinner is served at eight o’clock. I plan to leave at three thirty in the afternoon. It’s seven oh seven in the evening right now.

Rule Ten — If you use AM or PM, use arabic numbers, and likewise when precision is implied, even when the precise time is on the hour, the half hour, or the quarter hour.

Correct examples: Dinner is served at 8:00am. The plane leaaves at 3:34pm. It’s 7:07 P.M. right this minute. The bomb is set to go off at 23:08.

Rule Eleven — Use noon and midnight rather than 12:00 P.M. and 12:00 A.M. Although they’re theoretically exact times, they’re also approximations of the location of the sun, like ‘dawn’ or ‘sunset.’ To be consistent, they have to be spelled out. Also, many people are confused about AM and PM in these contexts, and will often say ‘Twelve noon’ instead of 12:00 PM, or ‘Twelve midnight’ for 12:00 AM.

This actually makes a lot of sense. Other than amongst obsessive-compulsives, most people actually mean (or imply) ‘about’ when they speak of times. Few people will shoot you dead if you're one or two minutes late to an appointment made for ‘noon.’

Correct examples: She’s never up past midnight. We usually eat luncheon at noon. It’s high noon, on the dot. The take-off is on the stroke of midnight.

Rule Twelve — Hyphenate all compound numbers from twenty-one through ninety-nine unless using archaic forms for effect.

Correct examples: Ninety-nine bottles of beer on the wall, ninety-nine bottles of beer, take one down and pass it around, ninety-eight bottles of beer. Four and twenty blackbirds, baked in a pie. One hundred and forty-five ducks in a row.

Rule Thirteen — Never use arabic numerals in dialog.

Correct examples: “I plan to leave the office at half past five.” “Twelve-thirty is way past my usual bedtime.” “Happy New Year!”

Incorrect examples: “I plan to leave the office at 5:30pm.” “12:30 is way past my usual bedtime.” “Happy 01/01/2014!”

Comments

Ducks

I was told that it was one hundred forty-five ducks on the wall. It's kind of messy to take one down and pass it around. The ducks don't like it either. And doesn't really belong between one hundred and forty-five

Love,

Paula

Seek freedom and become captive of your desires. Seek discipline and find your liberty.

The Coda
Chapterhouse: Dune

Paula

Seek freedom and become captive of your desires. Seek discipline and find your liberty.

The Coda
Chapterhouse: Dune

Duck! ...Where?

In UK usage, we would almost always put 'and' between any 'hundred' and the odds and ends. I know you don't over that side. Vive la difference, so to speak.

Incidentally, we would also almost never say 'three-fourths' (or even 'one-fourth'). It would be 'three-quarters'.

Penny

Re: How to count...

Hellop Paula,

I was told that it was one hundred forty-five ducks on the wall. And doesn't really belong between one hundred and forty-five.

Why not?

I was taught that it is one hundred and forty-five. That is the way most people in the UK spell and speak it.

Regards,

Dave.

An amplification

erin's picture

On rule eleven, until the digital age 12PM was midnight and 12AM was noon. Digital clocks reversed this because of the constant 12:08 PM reading on the face made people assume that 12:00 (noon) must be 12:00 PM and indeed a lot of digital clocks were so programmed. Anyone in the US fifty years or older who passed the second grade KNOWS that noon is AM and midnight is PM, you got that hammered into you.

Nowadays, even schoolteachers are confused since their teaching materials don't even agree.

Different governmental and commercial agencies around the world have different definitions now as to just when 12:00 gets an AM or a PM. Everybody has an opinion on this, or three. If you choose six different US government agencies, you will get twelve different options on how to do this.

12:00 AM noon, 12:00 PM midnight (common pre-digital)
12:00 N, 12:00 M (airline schedules)
12:00 PM noon, 12:00 AM midnight (common post-digital)
24 hour clock with 00:00 for midnight (used in some countries as official time)
24 hour clock with 24:00 for midnight (some people will do anything)
24 hour clock with 23:59 for midnight (chickenshit time)
24 hour clock with 2400/0000 for midnight (military time, which you use is conditional but systematic, written usually uses 0000, spoken usually uses 2400)
24 hour clock with 0000 for midnight (always, scientific time, may be written with colons)
24 hour clock with 2359 for midnight (chickenshit military time)
Never say 12:00 anything, use 12:01 (local governments and hotels sometimes use this one for schedules)
Never say 12:00 anything, use 11:59 (rail and bus schedules)
Use words, "noon" and "midnight" (the only one that is always correct)

For the purposes of fiction, you don't want to confuse someone or have them disagreeing with you about how you represent time unless that is the point of a scene; comedy has its own rules. Otherwise write out "noon" and "midnight" and save your readers having to figure out which you mean.

Hugs,
Erin

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

The beauty ...

... of using 2359 as a signifier of midnight is that it allows no confusion as to the day. If you use 'midnight' it could either be the end of a day or the beginning of the same day; it's a sort of no man's land with a potential 24 hour error in timing. I've always understood that was the reason for using it in the military - at least in the UK.

I worked for a company that has a lot of dealings with the US. We were always required to use numerical and alphabetic dates to avoid the confusion of the US date format's being different from ours. eg 12 Jan 2010 rather than 12/01/2010

Robi

>> 12PM was midnight and 12AM was noon

Puddintane's picture

Golly. I'm digital.

I think the "digital" standard is older than digital clocks, since it's also "logical," in that 12:00 near midnight spends a lot more time (infinitesimally less then 60 seconds) being before the meridian than it does being at the exact point 12:00:00 < 12:00:01. I vaguely remember being taught this "mnemonic" in school, which was before digital clocks that I recall. Perhaps it's regional.

Both are actually theoretically inapplicable to noon and midnight, since AM and PM expand respectively to "Ante Meridiem" and "Post Meridiem" respectively, which logically exclude both noon and midnight. They're also old-fashioned terms that predate time zones because, something like the Spanish Barber, who shaves every man who doesn't shave himself. Unless one lives on the central line of longitude for one's time zone, neither "noon" nor "midnight" have anything to do with the actual position of the sun, so the meridian macht nichts.

Here's a bunch of stuff about the confusion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock#Confusion_at_noon...

Cheers,

Puddin'

-

Cheers,

Puddin'

A tender heart is an asset to an editor: it helps us be ruthless in a tactful way.
--- The Chicago Manual of Style

Logic

erin's picture

Everyone always has a "logical", reason to support the one they prefer or were taught but logic really has nothing to do with it. Logically, why should 12pm follow 11am at noon? The logic I was taught was that noon was 12am because otherwise the sequence would 12am to 11am instead of 1am to 12am. So logic has no traction.

It's a singularity, the point at which every conceivable rule is just a rule and requires an exception to handle it. The best rule of exception is to use the words noon and midnight since they always work for everything except military and scientific principles.

The other singularity that causes confusion in time is that there is no year 0 in any calendar system. Therefore you can make logical cases for decades, centuries and milllenia starting on either the 0s or the 1s.

The Wikipedia article actually points out an additional confusion: 12 M means 12 midnight in some systems but 12m means 12 noon in others with the m standing for media. :)

Hugs,
Erin

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

From the Swedish rules

Here we consider any number above 12 to be great/large, mostly because it is impractible to have so long words in "bread"-text. We are also adviced to use the 0001 for time when it is a real time expression. Although we have for about 50 years left the AM ("fm") and PM ("em"), theatres and cinemas often still use "9.30" as the start of a perfomance. For cinemas this has partly been changed as today some shows are availible before noon.
A greater problem for us here is the format for giving dates. Even if ANSI does advice to use YYYY-MM-DD format, most persons using English language still have another way of giving dates. This leads to problems so I would suggest to either write he month in letters OR use the ANSI system.
Best greetings from
Ginnie

GinnieG

Uppercase numbers...

Puddintane's picture

As long as we're talking about standards, what's up with Unicode* refusing to include both uppercase and lowercase numbers? Whilst uppercase "lining" numbers look perfectly lovely in tables, they're ugly as sin in running text, which is why I avoid the use of arabic numbers in running text entirely, unless there are enough of them to form a little block of them, which serves partially to disguise their icky appearance.

These arabic numbers may** show up as Text Figures: 0123456789 on your monitor.

These arabic numbers will probably show up as Lining Figures: 0123456789 on your monitor.

If the numbers look similar, try here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_figures

Cheers,

Puddin'

* They claim that text figures are merely "presentation" choices, but the same can be said of upper and lowercase alphabetic characters, yet they managed to squeeze in those presentation characters. The real reason is that Unicode was originated by "techies" completely ignorant of typography and design, so countless oversights have had to be rectified after the fact by committees of scholars and typographical experts. The dweebs still have the upper hand.

** It depends on whether you have a font with text figures available, and whether I included it in the list of fonts I used to display the examples.

-

Cheers,

Puddin'

A tender heart is an asset to an editor: it helps us be ruthless in a tactful way.
--- The Chicago Manual of Style

Binary Keyboards

LibraryGeek's picture

It has to do with keyboards, starting back with typewriters. Typewriters had but two characters per key, and one set of numerals was given up so that an equivalent number of special characters could be provided. An additional row of keys would have been tricky for typing, while creating a means of having more shift levels, a trinary shift as opposed to a binary shift, would have been an interesting engineering problem. While with computers it would have been possible to establish a third shift, using the alt key, the alt functions were given to a bunch of other stuff, of which I only know that alt 0 clears the typing buffer (which I just discovered by accident; this is take two of this post.)

Yours,

John Robert Mead