Story Tellers, Writers, and Hacks

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Blog About: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

From Wikipedia;

Storytelling is the conveying of events in words, and images, often by improvisation or embellishment. Stories or narratives have been shared in every culture as a means of entertainment, education, cultural preservation, and instilling moral values. Crucial elements of stories and storytelling include plot, characters, and narrative point of view.

A writer is a person who uses written words in various styles and techniques to communicate ideas. Writers produce various forms of literary art and creative writing such as novels, short stories, poetry, plays, news articles, screenplays, or essays. Skilled writers are able to use language to express ideas and their work contributes significantly to the cultural content of a society. The word is also used elsewhere in the arts – such as songwriter – but as a standalone term, "writer" normally refers to the creation of written language.

Hack - a colloquial and usually pejorative term used to refer to a writer who is paid to write low-quality, rushed articles or books "to order", often with a short deadline. In a fiction-writing context, the term is used to describe writers who are paid to churn out sensational, lower-quality "pulp" fiction such as "true crime" novels or "bodice ripping" paperbacks. In journalism, the term is used to describe a writer who is deemed to operate as a "mercenary" or "pen for hire", expressing their client's political opinions in pamphlets or newspaper articles. So-called "hack writers" are usually paid by the number of words in their book or article; as a result, hack writing has a reputation for quantity taking precedence over quality.

~

There is a good little movie out there called ‘The Words.’ It is the story of a young man, a New Yorker, whose sole ambition is to be a writer. He dedicates himself to writing a successful novel, one that will launch his career. He is assisted in this endeavor by an understanding wife he loves dearly and an indulgent father.

In time, after rejection after rejection, he has no choice but to get a job, but does not, at first, give up the dream, one that is dying slowly. Then one day he finds an old typewritten manuscript in a second hand leather briefcase his wife bought him. After reading it he realized what he has been writing will never measure up to the work he found. For reasons he does not understand, he copies the manuscript on his laptop computer, word for word. He doesn’t even correct spelling errors. When his wife, who also uses the laptop, finds it and reads it, she raves about it, all but crying as she tells him how wonderful it is.

Well, you guessed it. He submits it for publication under his name. Overnight he becomes the darling of the New York literary world, catapulting him into the limelight he had always aspired to.

Unfortunately, the turd in the punchbowl floats to the surface when an old man confronts him one day and informs him the story was not a work of fiction, that it was a true story which he wrote but lost one day when he left his briefcase on a train.

I’ll not tell you how things play out. It is a good little movie and for those who put pen to paper, or fingers to keyboard, it is worth a look.

~

I relate this story because I have always been fascinated by what motivates people to write. Of the writers I know, or have known since some are now dead, there is a story behind the reason each of them sat down before their typewriter or keyboard and told stories. Two did so as part of their struggle to come to terms with the Vietnam War. Another was the literary world’s very own Walter Mitty, a great writer, but one who sought to live vicariously through his writing and the real life warriors he had an opportunity to rub shoulders with. The patriarch of the group, the very personification of a dirty old man who love to remind people he was the most prolific writer from Alabama, (to which I replied he was the only writer from Alabama), was and will always be a superb storyteller who actually was a part of the world he wrote about. Me, I took up the craft quite by accident.

When I arrived in Korea for an unaccompanied tour, my sponsor told me in the year I would be there I would become a fanatic about something. Since the professional girls in Uijongbu did nothing for me and I wasn’t about to become a bar fly at the O Club, I started writing my own take on a book a former British Army general wrote about. Well, I found it was great fun. In Korea it was a form of escapism. Anyone who ever worked in an Ops center of a bunker buried under a mountain where there was always something going on can appreciate the need for a wee bit of escapism.

Writing is now a passion, one I enjoy immensely. It has proven to be both profitable and life changing. The one thing it did not do was cause me to forget I was living in the real world. You see, in the movie ‘The Words,’ at the very end one of the characters makes the point that fiction and reality come close, but never touch, that a writer must chose which he, or she, prefers. And one who has read any of my stuff knows which one I picked.

This leads me to the point of this piece. As mentioned, in my travels I have come across a fair number of storytellers, writers, and hacks. Many cannot tell me why they write. Like me, they simply started. Others set out in pursuit of an agenda, to promote a cause or to right the wrongs of the world by wielding their mighty pen, crusaders clad in paper armor seeking to slay dragons. A few, much like the character in the movie, have taken up writing with the goal of becoming the next F. Scott Fitzgerald, wined and dined by New York’s literary glitterati. In doing so many lose their way. I expect a fair number become so enamored by their fame that they willingly forget about telling stories, churning out books that are shadows of their early works, rehashes of the same story, or simply a collection in which paper cutout characters go from scene to scene with little purpose and even less soul. In short, they become hacks. Granted, some can make a handsome career out of being a hack, provided they have a following that enjoy what they write.

It is not my purpose here to create divisions within the ranks of writers who contribute to TS/BC or claim one person’s reason for writing and the material they produce is superior to another’s. Nor do I expect the patrons of this website will be influenced, one way or another by what I said. People who read the stories here on TS/BC do so for reasons that are as varied as motivation that motivated their authors to them and will continue to follow their favorite authors because the stories those authors write strike a cord with them.

This piece, (and I hate to use the term), is a think piece, a brain fart, if you will. In my last blog I mentioned that it was not always necessary to have a happy ending to a story, a point that provoked some interesting responses. I expect this little ditty, which is really only an observation, will do likewise.

Any who, that’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it.

HW Coyle

Comments

What causes us to write?

That question is as diverse as for the reason that we live. We each have our own purpose whether we say we know it or think we know. Some is for greed and fame as you say. Others is for redemption or understanding of ones past. Others write to tell of the wrongs in the world.

Who can truly say why they write, for one answer may be as diverse from another.

What causes us to even come up with the story that we somehow formulated in our thoughts? Why did we choose that one or way over another and where does it lead us? Writing is a form of expression for the individual. Some may not be fully understood where others are as clear as day.

Be I a story teller, writer or hack the answer only lies deep within us. To paraphrase. I think so therefor I am. I write for there is a need within and a desire to say.

Ibi

story tellers and hacks

Yea verily, I agree wholeheartedly.

I have recently (and unfortunately) begun to feel that my works are not those which I wished them to be. In other words, I’m afraid I am become a “hack” myself. Due to this perception any of my more recent efforts are seen to be lacking thus reinforcing that image of myself. As a result I am having great difficulty producing further works although I am attempting to complete a story which has been under way for some time now.

How did I get into writing in the first place? You are quite correct in your description of that which causes someone to write... I haven’t the faintest idea. One day, I was bored and sat down before the wordprocessor and a week later discovered I had twenty-eight chapters of a story written, start to a somewhat hazy finish. I cannot say if the story was good or if it was bad; but it was a story. I have been writing ever since.

Do I think my works are good? Well, I suppose I would like to think so, but I find the works of many others to be far superior to those of my own. Fortunately I have also found others works (published paperbacks) which are rather dismal in their approach. I find myself stumbling over their spelling errors, grammatical conflicts, phonetical spelling of words, and more. I have frequently seen the misuse of "their", "there", and "they're" as well as other common mistakes. I have produced my share (and still do) so, in general, I simply cringe and continue on. I’m not someone who is a proper wordsmith but some people produce material of such low quality that it makes me wish I had never associated myself with the art of writing.

I would like to think that I have been improving in my practice of the art but then I find a work on the shelves which so greatly outshines my own efforts that I become embarrassed and wish I had never begun writing in the first place

Yes, there are good writers, there are exceptional writers, and there are mediocre writers who still are able to formulate a storyline and actually hold to it throughout the story.

For those who come up with excellent ideas but who are presently unable to properly attach descriptive verbiage to make their story something worth reading without causing severe hiccups due to improper word selection, spelling, or grammatical construction... Keep writing, have faith. You cannot improve if you don’t try in the first place. Learn... from your efforts and your mistakes. One day you’ll look back at your first efforts and cringe. Usually that means that you can now see the problems in that which you produced. You have, finally, become a better writer.

Anesidora

I really don't know why I

I really don't know why I started writing about 14 years ago, just happened. I always had a hard time writing, as I am perfectionistic with my creations. Now when I write, characters visit me in my dreams, or an idea will come in my dreams that I can't shake until I commit it to the pc. Basically I write my story or chapter all in one sitting, and I write until I run out of steam. It seems the characters tell me what happens to them as some of my stories here had no plans, they just developed on their own except for the last one, that was planned out in my head. For me the hard part is trying to make my characters seem realistic in that you as the reader cares what happens to them, hopefully I have been successful in that, but I guess only the readers can tell me that, but I myself have always felt that my characters are real, but it is hard trying to flesh them out, give them insight that is not all me, but most of them are a reflection to some degree of me, or at least some of my dreams. I think that is why I prefer to write in the first person narrative because it is easier to get empathy for the character from the reader, the challenge is getting across other character's motives without a sudden change of narrative, I had that problem with My Best Friend's Girl with getting across Leon's manipulations, I made reference to subtle signs and behaviors.

Always

erin's picture

I've always been a storyteller. At the age of three I entertained my cousins by telling stories with blocks, dolls, spools and rocks as characters. I learned to read that year, too, and by the age of eight was buying my own books and visiting the library on my own.

Once, going into the library at that age, I asked the librarian to help me find a book. I knew the title (one of the Mushroom Planet books) and the librarian said that she could look up the author.

"The author?" I said.

"The person who wrote the book, then we can find it because all of the books are in order by who wrote them."

I looked around. This was in Brawley, CA and the library took up one half of the City Hall complex, minus a small office for some bureaucrat. It had three wings, a reference wing to the southeast, a children's wing to the northeast and a reading room and adult fiction wing to the southwest. The short lobby to the northwest was filled with displays from local schools, dioramas and such. The librarian sat behind an enormous desk in the middle but I was talking to the children's librarian at a smaller desk in the entrance to the children's wing.

"All of these books," I said. "Someone wrote them?"

"Someone had to write all of them," she said.

"I want to do that," I said. She smiled.

Hugs,
Erin

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

Hacks

"Rehashes of old stories"

Yup, that's me!
:-)

Seriously, I think of it as a way of giving as much depth as I can manage from a style that has been described as 'abrupt' and even 'cinematic', in the sense that things happen in swift succession. Your own mileage may vary, of course, as well as your opinion.

I challenge the definition of 'Hack'

persephone's picture

You are being unfair to yourself, in effect every story is a rehash.

The vast majority of successful stories tend to follow the classic Shakespearian five act structure of scene setting, rising action, climax, falling action and denouement, whilst the base story lines have been handed down since time immemorial. If you don't believe me read Joseph Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces (thank you for showing me that Nancy).

Great storytelling starts with great characters so I would challenge the definition of the Hack. Perhaps we should define the Hack as someone who doesn't love their stories, or their characters?

Persephone

Non sum qualis eram

My definition

...as applied to me may have been a little tongue in cheek, of course. You said later about how addictive it is, and I agree. I write mainly for myself, but I was taught it was polite to share.

Don't forget concept crawl!

That is what I call it when an author takes an idea from one book and further develops it in succeeding works. An example is David Weber's Inheritors of Empire story with its Connecticut Yankee or Lord Kalvan of Otherwhen, idea of a very tech advanced individual trying to uplift a pre-industrial age culture. Through a number of books he finally reached his Safe-Hold series which is solely about that idea.

It's rather too bad he gets so badly bogged down in details. There is a story in there if you look hard enough!

As for why I tell stories, it's definitely for escapism and distraction from reality. I actually can't remember when I wasn't telling stories in one form or another. Writing them down is somewhat new, but the telling? Pre-school and before. :)

Hugs
Grover

I've started so I'll finish….

persephone's picture

Here's another silly thought.

We may all have different reasons for why we started to write… but am I alone in thinking it's dangerously addictive?

Persephone

Non sum qualis eram

For better or worse?

Andrea Lena's picture

Stories are like Lays Potato Chips? You can't write just one?

  

To be alive is to be vulnerable. Madeleine L'Engle
Love, Andrea Lena

The literary curse of sisyphus

persephone's picture

That's better than the thought I had - we're addicted to literary heroines :)

Sorry

Persephone

Non sum qualis eram

I write

Amethyst's picture

because I can't not write. I have so many ideas and characters and scenarios running through my head all the time that I need to write to give those ideas physical expression. It' like why an artist paints or sculpts or paints. They see something in their mind or in the physical world that speaks to them and they need to express it before they can stop thinking about it and move on to something else. That is why I write, but I am still not certain why I decided to start sharing what I write. Possibly it was a natural progression, or a desire to make others see the strange things I see in my minds eye.

*hugs*

Amethyst

ChibiMaker1.jpg

Don't take me too seriously. I'm just kitten around. :3

Almost every professional writer is a hack...

Puddintane's picture

...of some sort, aside from the leeches who depend upon some sort of Sugar Daddy (or Momma).

Almost all of Dickens' stuff was written for serial publication, paid by the word, where Joyce's immortal words were largely supported by paid reviews, then by sponging off friends and a number of gullible women, various money-making schemes, most of which failed, whilst he drank away any potential profits. In short, he was the sort of fellow one would be well-advised to stay away from, as he tended to leave wreckage in his wake.

If one wants to make a living from writing, one has to weigh the marketplace for words and one's ability to provide them on demand, because modern publishing contracts usually specify extremely short deadlines for producing lots of words. My own last contract was for roughly five- to six-hundred thousand words in exactly four months, including edits and revisions, with substantial penalties for non-performance.

In short, writing professionally is a job, and not a particularly well-paid one, unless one hits a lucky jackpot with something like the first (and following) Harry Potter books, but one's chances of doing this are about the same as winning the grand prize in the national lottery.

Self-publishing has changed the landscape considerably, in that one can escape the clutches of the major publishers, but it also requires a level of self-discipline on the part of authors that's usually the result of the habits of a lifetime. Soldiers, lawyers, grant-writers, and others who've written professionally are the usual suspects, because they've had both the basics of excellent performance of difficult tasks banged into their heads, and the fact that not every writing task is a happy stroll through the park, drilled into their heads, some of which heads have been smacked upside at least several to drive home the lessons.

On the other hand, people tell stories, and have been doing it for a million years or so, so the storytelling "gene," if you will, is in all of us, if only we have the skill to call it forth. Some people have a natural gift for it, and we all recognise it when we see it, because a good wordsmith can hold almost any audience rapt. Others, it must be admitted, can't carry a story any better than Charles Darwin or W.B. Yeats could carry a tune, which is nothing against either, since they were both very clever men indeed; they just didn't have the ear for notes.

My own advice for any self-publisher is to hire a professional editor, and to shop around. The best of them are wonderful resources, but they have to be knowledgeable in your particular field, and not all are honest enough to admit to their own shortcomings. Try them out with the same care one might use to select an architect. Look at their work. Submit a sample and see how it turns out, but expect to pay for it. Editors work by the word, just as authors do, but there's no particular upside for editing a NY Times Bestseller, other than the reference.

-

Cheers,

Puddin'

A tender heart is an asset to an editor: it helps us be ruthless in a tactful way.
--- The Chicago Manual of Style