A load of old bollocks about trans and bathrooms

A word from our sponsor:

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Caution: 

Blog About: 

This is old, it goes back to when Obama was president.

It was the usual anti trans and bathrooms. I don't know why this bothers me so much. I have used the ladies when I have been dressed several times without probems. I very rarely go out dressed though. I think it is the outright lies by these anti's use idiots

With the departments of Justice and Education’s new announcement on transgender access to showers, locker rooms, bathrooms, and other sex-specific facilities in schools, there is reason for concern.

The Obama administration has unlawfully rewritten law, meddling in state and local matters, and imposing bad policy on the entire nation.

Americans agree that while we should be sensitive to transgender individuals, others also have rights of privacy, safety, and their own beliefs that deserve respect and should not simply be pushed aside, especially when transgender persons can be accommodated in other ways.

The risk to the privacy and safety of women and girls is real. There have been numerous cases in recent years of men either cross-dressing or claiming to be transgender in order to access women’s bathrooms and locker rooms for inappropriate purposes. Here are six examples:

In 2009, a sex offender named Richard Rendler was arrested for wearing fake breasts and a wig while loitering in a women’s restroom in a Campbell, California, shopping center. Rendler had previously been arrested on charges of child molestation and indecent exposure.

Not trans, just a pervert

In 2010, Berkeley police arrested Gregorio Hernandez. Hernandez had disguised himself as a woman on two separate occasions to get inside a UC Berkeley locker room. Once in the locker room, Hernandez allegedly used his cell phone to photograph women.

Again, Not trans, just a pervert

In 2013, Jason Pomare was arrested for cross-dressing in order to gain access to the women’s restroom at a Macy’s department store in Palmdale, California. Pomare snuck a video camera in to secretly videotape women while they used the restroom.

Not trans, just a pervert, dressed so he could set up cameras

In 2014, Christopher Hambrook—who faked being a transgender person named Jessica—was jailed in Toronto, Canada. Hambrook preyed on women at two Toronto shelters, and had previously preyed on other women and girls as young as 5 years old to as old as 53. Hambrook’s case in particular shows the importance of protecting the privacy and safety of some of our most vulnerable citizens: the homeless and others who seek emergency shelter. And yet, the Obama administration recently proposed a rule that would impose a “gender identity” mandate here as well.

faked being transgender

In 2015, two spying instances were recorded in Virginia—one at a mall and one at a Wal-Mart. Both instances involved a man in women’s clothing who used a mirror and camera to take pictures of a mother and her 5-year-old daughter and a 53-year-old woman while they were in neighboring restroom stalls. The suspect wore a pink shirt and a long wig to present himself as a woman.

Not trans, just a pervert, dressed to set up cameras

In 2016, a man used a women’s locker room at a public swimming pool in Washington state to undress in front of young girls who were changing for swim practice. When Seattle Parks and Recreation staff asked him to leave, the man claimed that “the law has changed and I have a right to be here.” The man was apparently referring to a Washington state rule that allows individuals to use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity. However, the man made no attempt to present as a woman.

Not trans, just a pervert, trying to use a law to his advantage

As these examples illustrate, there are people who will abuse transgender policies. Although the Obama administration wants to keep its focus on bathrooms, its transgender directive goes much farther and actually requires biological male students who identify as female be granted unfettered access to women’s and girls’ showers at school gyms.

People will abuse any law, but none of these incidents involved a real transgender person.

So what are women and girls to do when a biological male wearing a wig and makeup walks in to an open shower next to them and they are shocked by the intrusion? According to the administration’s directive, “the desire to accommodate others’ discomfort” is no reason at all to prevent transgender people from accessing the intimate facilities of their choice.

Moreover, the directive prevents schools from requiring transgender people to have surgery, take hormones, have a medical diagnosis, or even act or dress in any particular way before having the “right” to be treated exactly like a person of the opposite sex.

The logical effect would be to silence women and girls who might otherwise speak out to prevent serious crimes from happening for fear that they would be accused of bigotry if they make the wrong call.

The interests and desires of transgender persons, especially adults, shouldn’t be placed over the privacy and safety of women and girls. There are ways of accommodating transgender people with private facilities without endangering and silencing women who could be hurt by policies allowing anyone unfettered access to their lockers, showers, and bathrooms.

None of these involved real trans people, and yet they use examples of perverts to tar transgender ladies with the same brush and to engender fear in women, sickening.

Comments

It gets worse

A US Congresswoman said recently... no make that basically accused the US Transportation Secretary and his husband of going into women's restrooms. She told him to keep out. If she has evidence of this actually happening then she needs to show it otherwise, she needs to shut up. But she won't. It is election year in the USA and anything goes.

This anti LGBTQ+ disease of the right is spreading faster than the Pandemic.
Samantha

And we have JK Rowling, seems

leeanna19's picture

And we have JK Rowling, seems easy compared with it being used to score political points. Religion seems to play a larger part in the US too.
It could be because our official religion is C of E which is religion lite.

Unless you go to church most of our interaction is christenings, weddings and funeral services.

cs7.jpg
Leeanna

Five Cases

joannebarbarella's picture

Of males impersonating females to gain entry into female bathrooms for indecent purposes in thirteen years. I exclude the Canadian one because it could not be blamed on any US law.

Scarcely a justification for the current wave of "bathroom laws" in the USA, and none of the transgressions were aimed at raping women.

I just can't get over how a

leeanna19's picture

I just can't get over how a guy dressing as woman to do something like that is lumped in with trans. Are they going to say that someone crossdressing to rob a bank is the fault of trans people too?

cs7.jpg
Leeanna

Not trans

Since none of the examples were of trans individuals, the directive did not apply to them, just as it did not apply to those who place cameras in women's bathrooms or locker rooms without cross-dressing. Unless we are to place guards at the entrance of every public bathroom and locker room, we cannot prevent perverts from abusing women who use those facilities.

Also, Leanna stated that "There are ways of accommodating transgender people with private facilities..." However none of the "bathroom bills" enacted or proposed provided for any such accommodations or private facilities. Instead, they would require fully transitioned women to use the men's facilities and fully transitioned men to use the women's facilities. I fail to see how such requirements promote public safety.

If Leanna was only quoting what someone else said, I apologize to her, but she did not make that clear in her post.

the mistake you are making

is thinking any of these transphobes cares about the truth of their claims about actually protecting cis women

They want to hate trans people

No, not mistaken, they do

leeanna19's picture

No, not mistaken, they do this for their own agenda. They create fear in to foster support for their own agenda.

cs7.jpg
Leeanna