Couple sues over adopted son's sex-assignment surgery

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Blog About: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/14/18257202-couple-s...

Couple sues over adopted son's sex-assignment surgery
By Colleen Jenkins
Reuters

A South Carolina couple sued doctors and state social workers on Tuesday for subjecting a 16-month-old child born with both male and female genitalia to what they say was medically unnecessary and irreversible sex-assignment surgery while the toddler was in foster care.
The state and federal lawsuits - believed by the couple's lawyers to be the first of their kind in the United States - argue that doctors should not have performed surgery to make the child's body appear to be female when they knew they could not predict how gender would develop.
The child, now 8, has shown strong signs of identifying as male and recently began living as a boy, according to Pam and Mark Crawford, who adopted him after the surgery.
The couple, a psychiatrist and stay-at-home dad, said they are taking legal action in the hopes of helping other children who face similar medical conditions.
"We feel very strongly that these decisions to permanently alter somebody's genitalia and their reproductive ability for no medical reason whatsoever is an abhorrent practice and can't be continued," Pam Crawford said in a phone interview.
"It is too late for our son," she added. "The damage has been done to him."
The lawsuit filed in state court in Columbia names the South Carolina Department of Social Services, Greenville Hospital System and Medical University of South Carolina as defendants.
Spokeswomen for the state department and the hospital system said they could not comment on the pending litigation, which alleges gross negligence and medical malpractice based on a lack of informed consent.

A spokeswoman for the Medical University of South Carolina - where the surgery took place - said the suit would be reviewed by the hospital's leadership and general counsel.
The child, identified only as M.C., was born in South Carolina in November 2004 and entered the state's foster care system in February 2005 after being removed from the custody of his biological parents.

Shortly after he was born, doctors noted that he had "ambiguous genitals" and both male and female reproductive organs, the lawsuits said.
Though doctors determined that he could be raised as either a boy or a girl, they opted for genital surgery that made the child's body look female - a decision the Crawfords say was premature because his dominant gender identity had not yet emerged.
"The surgery eliminated M.C.'s potential to procreate as a male and caused a significant and permanent impairment of sexual function," according to the filings in state court.
"The doctors knew that sex assignment surgeries on infants with conditions like M.C.'s poses a significant risk of imposing a gender that is ultimately rejected by the patient," the lawsuit says.

The federal lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, says the surgery violated the child's constitutional rights.
Risks not fully explained
Sex-assignment surgeries on infants with intersex conditions, previously called hermaphroditism, have been performed since the 1950s, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center and Advocates for Informed Choice, which are helping represent the Crawfords and their child.
The medical procedures often are performed without the risks being fully explained, the groups said.
"Doctors often assume they have to do surgery to make their bodies fit the stereotypes," said Anne Tamar-Mattis, executive director of Advocates for Informed Choice, a legal advocacy group for children born with variations of reproductive or sexual anatomy. In the case of the Crawfords' child, "the doctors knew from the beginning that there was a strong probability that this child would be a boy."

The Crawfords, who live in Columbia, said they initially raised M.C. as a girl after gaining custody when the toddler was about 20 months old.
But they said they soon noticed M.C. tended toward interests typically associated with males and preferred boys' clothing. As he grew older, he asked for his hair to be cut short like his father's and wanted to join a gymnastics class as a boy, they said.
"He's always been able to amuse himself with a toolkit," Mark Crawford said. "He's more likely than any of our other children to be climbing trees, wanting to ride bikes, flying model airplanes."

A couple of months ago, in consultation with their pediatrician, the Crawfords said their son made the transition to live as a boy and has been accepted as one by his friends.
But they added that the long-term consequences of the surgery are heartbreaking to try to explain to him.
"It's really tough because he's now asking the questions about how he can be like everybody else," Pam Crawford said.

Comments

sad story

I read this same Reuters story in the NY Times today. This is sad. There was no reason to do this surgery so early.

not ignorance

More likely malice forethought via unintended consequences.

"well, gee. They always want girls to adopt, right? Then that will be how we decide."

God complex much?

They do it because it seems to work

I have seen it it suggested that about one-third of people strongly identify as male (this is regardless of actual bodily arrangements, of course), another third strongly identify as female, and the remaining third will accept whatever they are told. This means that when assigning a sex to an intersex baby, even choosing at random doctors will get it "right" two-thirds of the time (on average.) So they keep doing it.

John B.

There was a very sad case

many years ago where male twins were being circumcised, the priest accidentally cut too deep on one, causing injury to his genitalia. The child was raised as a girl and forced against her will to be a girl until she rebelled and started living as a male. Unfortunately, the child never recovered from the mental abuse from the wacko psychiatrist on the case who skewed the data to show the child to be a happy girl.

    Stanman
May Your Light Forever Shine

Urban Legend...

Andrea Lena's picture

...First of all, priests don't perform circumcisions; doctors do. In some instances, a mohel will perform the surgery as a rite in the Jewish faith. And the child would have been attended to by a psychologist, who would have been sorely pressed to 'skew the data," since the only data available would have been the child's self report.

  

To be alive is to be vulnerable. Madeleine L'Engle
Love, Andrea Lena

Not quite

It's not quite an urban legend, he just got the facts very wrong. There was a Canadian boy named David Reimer. He had a tight foreskin, or something, so the doctors recommended him and his twin be circumcised. The doctor botched it and mutilated his penis. The boy was eventually "turned" into a girl on Doctor Money's advice. Dr. Money then proceeded to monitor David's progress throughout his childhood in order to write a paper. He lied about the results and claimed that David accepted his new role as a girl.

It is a very sad story, I had to learn it in my High School psychology class. He eventually transitions back to male but his life continues to fall apart. After his brother dies, he commits suicide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

My apologies...

Andrea Lena's picture

...I was completely wrong on that.

  

To be alive is to be vulnerable. Madeleine L'Engle
Love, Andrea Lena

If Only It Was

"In New York City, in the year 2005 [male circumcision] as performed by a fifty-seven year old mohel, was found to have given genital herpes to several small boys, and to have caused the deaths of at least two of them...Mayor Bloomberg overrode the reports by distinguished Jewish physicians who had warned about the dangers of the custom...The crucial thing, he said, was to be sure that the free exercise of religion was not being infringed."
-Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great, Atlantic Books, page 50

Ban nothing. Question everything.

I believe you'll see more

I believe you'll see more stories about intexuallity in the news. Researching it online (for my stories), gives me some ideas that 1 in 2000 people born as intersexuals is a bit too low...

TGSine --958