The Family Girl #054: To Wear A Bra...

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Blog About: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

The Family Girl Blogs
(aka "The New Working Girl Blogs")

Blog #54: To Wear A Bra Or Not To Wear A Bra -
That is the question...

To see all of Bobbie's Family Girl Blogs, click on this link:
http://bigclosetr.us/topshelf/book/28818/family-girl-blogs

I read a blog here in BC posted just little while ago, and it caught my eye. I mean, how can it not, with a title like, "Women Better Without Bras." Right? And you don't have to be a boy for a blog like this to pique your interest. Prurient male curiosity aside, women would be interested in the blog, too. (See the post http://bigclosetr.us/topshelf/blog/43836/french-study-women-..., by MITTFH)

Seems MITTFH was referring to an article from a site called "The Local," where a Professor Rouillon talked about a study he did that showed bras provide no physiological benefit for women, and that it might actually be the opposite - that it might actually be detrimental...
Hmmm...

Though I haven't been living as a girl for that long, I know that what a girl thinks of herself is based in large part on her looks. And to our current western standards of beauty, a girl's breasts figure largely in her beauty. My sister is so lucky to have large C-cup babies. True, they aren't double-D's or anything, They were, at least, plenty big for them to make her a cheerleader back in high school.

Those who have transitioned MTF, or are going through RLE or something similar, are always concerned about passing, and boobies are, of course, required to pass. But for girls like me who are... mammarily deficient (lol), bras are a godsend. With the right pair, an... under-endowed girl can still look spectacular.

And besides which, they are actually very pretty just for their own sake. That's just my own opinion, of course.

I also subscribe to the notion that a girl who who isn't completely nude is always prettier than when she's in the altogether - with a strategically-positioned scarf or a tiny diaphanous brassiere instead of being completely naked, a girl can use her womanly charms to devastating effect. (And though I don't have much experience compared to other girls, I know that this is true wink-wink)

As to the physical benefits of a bra, all I can say is that wearing a bra helps bring my little babies under control, and stop them from, ummm, shifting around when it's not convenient or appropriate.

More than that, having bras help reduce the irritation on the nipples when one's clothes keep on sliding over them. When my boobies were just coming in, I was really thankful for this protection that my trainers gave me.

I cannot have an opinion, though, on whether bras do help provide support or prevent sagging. My babies aren't exactly hefty, and I haven't been wearing bras long enough to notice the benefit (or lack thereof): with the help of the hormones, I grew to smallish B-size cups. I would have wanted them to have grown bigger, but that's it. And I don't wanna monkey around with my med's dosages just on the off-chance that they'd help me gain a cup size girls my height and build are more susceptible to liver and kidney problems from wrong hormone levels.

The thing I think a study like that of Professor Rouillon has overlooked is the other things a brassiere gives a girl, other than supporting her breasts or preventing them from sagging.

Ancient Greek and Roman women can't all be mistaken, not to mention those from ancient China and those from more modern eras, like the Victorian and Edwardian eras, not to mention those from imperial France, and the girls from the 1920's, thirties, forties, fifties and sixties. For boob-challenged girls like me, one of the greatest inventions of the seventies, the wonderbra, was the best thing since sliced bread (lol).

I cannot claim to think that my point of view regarding women's clothes, women's underwear in particular, is typical but, for me, lingerie in silky, delicate materials an in sexy colors, cuts and patterns are a big turn-on, and I love wearing them, even if I am the only one who knows I am.

But it seems a lot of others think the same way I do: Many women are not too happy with the good professor's conclusion that bras provide no physiological benefit, given the many comments that the article generated. So much so, I think, that The Local, or perhaps Professor Rouillon himself, felt the need to put up another article not even 10 hours after the original was put up. (The same site where MITTFH got the link came out with a new article hours after the first one, this one entitled "Author of breasts study: more research needed." (see http://www.thelocal.fr/page/view/women-doubt-controversial-f...)

In the new article, the professor stressed the preliminary nature of his findings, and that more study is needed.

Hmmm...

Well, in any case, the question still remains: to wear a bra or not to wear a bra - that is the question... (apologies to William Shakespeare lol)

For me, however, even if it is indeed proven that bras don't really help physically, I think I will continue wearin' em.

  

Note:
Lots of graphics in Bobbi's posts use publicly-accessible pics from the net: No ownership is claimed nor IP infringements intended



click here  for the prev. Family Girl post
click here  for the next Family Girl  post
click here for the Family Girl MainPage

Comments

I read the same article

I read the same article yesterday. It is very interesting though.

I like your comments, and have to agree with you (from a male single parent's view on having raised a teenage daughter).

Hugs,
Mark <3

Surely you mean...

Extravagance's picture

To stick with Bs, or to go bigger than Bs, that is the question? = )

Catfolk Pride.PNG

Thanks, Bobbie.

I hope that all women read your blog.

    Stanman
May Your Light Forever Shine

I can only speak for myself...

I am about 4 months into HRT. My breasts (if you can call them that, I do!) are fairly small. The nipples are another story, they tend to announce themselves nicely. So I wear a sports bra. One benefit I hadn't expected, it takes my small girls and makes them, well, organized. They show a lot more distinctly. So, as you can guess, I am not going back. Wendy is finally growing a pair.

The funny thing is I was dogged into it by the other woman at work (who have been very supportive). Showing nipples is very crass, so I'm told.

As for the nipples, they can even show through the sports bra sometimes. :)

It really does get better.

Hate the bloody things

That said, wish I had a need for one. I have implants and since they are under muscle and I had AA cups (to be generous!) before I had them done they do not need any other support unless I do some heavy duty running or really jump around hard. I have never had anybody complain about it and I am careful for any clothing I wear to not show. If they do show then I grudgingly wear one.

But as all women know, the next best thing to an orgasm is removing the bloody thing at the end of a long day.

Kim

Next best?

I find that sometimes it causes one... A small one, mind, but... My girls definitely prefer being let free...

I'm still small myself though and only really need one for two things: preventing chafing, and the "wonder" effect. Well, three. If I'm not wearing one my nipples would undoubtedly make their presence known.

Abigail Drew.

Nipples

janet_L.'s picture

OddPOV -

I wish I could say the same.

After about 3.5 years of HRT my nipples have done exactly nothing. Of course my first endocrinologist was hyper-conservative - 2.5 years with virtually no change in the last year (any change at all was good by his standards!) Another year with a different Doc, and my breasts have enlarged significantly, but the nipples are still pretty much the same boy nipples I started out with. Of course even after the new Doc trippled my estradiol, I'm still getting a fraction of what my friend out on the coast is getting. (Of course she IS 30 years younger!)

'Though y'know, while they are the same size they started out, my nipples are more sensitive.

- Janet.

Versions differ

The version I read (on HuffPo I think) also put forth the claim that this study indicated that wearing bras causes breast cancer. If that is really one of the results of this study, then I am forced to question the validity of the entire study. It just does not make sense that an article of clothing can cause cancer, aside from whatever chemicals are in it. I remember some years back that it was claimed that tight briefs caused men to become sterile and triggered testicular cancer. I haven't heard anymore since then, but sales of "tightie-whities" seem to be very good and I haven't heard of any significant problems with male sterility or an increase in testicular cancer. That leads me to suspect similar claims about bras are at best an unknown sampling flaw, at worst the claim is on par with the researcher in Texas who claimed that children of gay parents were at significant risk of failure in their lives compared to children from heterosexual families.

And a French researcher claims that women would be better off not wearing bras . . . hmmmm . . . is that women of any age or only women in a particular age group? ;-)

Personally, I wear bras even though I too am rather "small". The nipples made me do it! :-)


"Life is not measured by the breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.”
George Carlin

A couple of things. As

A couple of things. As breasts aren't held up by muscles, but rather by Coopers ligaments, bras shouldn't have any increased effects upon sagging (other than possibly by shortening the ligaments, but that's unlikely). The other is that 'tighty-whities' and bikini style underwear for men _will_ reduce fertility. That's not a rumour, or even something that needs study - it's just physics and physiology. Pull the testicles up against the body, and they retain a higher temperature than if let to swing free. Sperm needs a lower temperature to live. So, boil your nuts, and you reduce your risk of giving women babies! (well, boil them, and you won't _want_ to be giving anyone anything)


I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.

I'm willing to concede

That the possibility of reduced viable sperm certainly makes sense. But how often does "common sense" fall before actual scientific investigation? What is the percentage of the reduction of viable sperm? Is it reversible by switching to looser underwear? Does the longterm wearing cause permanent sterility? These are all question that deserve proper study. And the issue of testicular cancer is extremely worthy of research. Possibly both can be covered in the same study. But either way these topics are deserving of major, peer-reviewed research, if they aren't already underway already. Study IS needed.

The same with the cancer-causing bra research. Statistically, over a hundred is a drop in the bucket compared to the size of the affected population. Based on what training I had when involved in journalism, just over a hundred is likely less than the margin of error. We did a survey of registered Democratic voters in one county in Oklahoma during an election year and it was mathematically determined that we needed at least 700 responses in order to be able to reach any valid conclusions. The number of Democratic voters in our sample county is considerably less than the number of bra-wearing women in the world. The larger the pool, the larger the sample size required to be able to reach any valid conclusions.


"Life is not measured by the breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.”
George Carlin

I can't find any of the

I can't find any of the direct studies, but I know there are a number of them.

Here's a link of a study based on temperature and effect on motility/mobility of sperm.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23196

As for the long term sterility - non-existent. Unlike ova (although I suspect that the 'born with all the eggs' isn't 100% correct), sperm are manufactured constantly. So, if you flush your prostate and testicles regularly, you'll end up getting rid of the 'bad' sperm and replace it with a new batch.


I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.

Other comments

The article cropped up on one of my social media feeds, and I shared it primarily to see what kind of reaction it would get (since I have no experience with the garment - either from wearing one or having an intimate relationship with someone who does).

On Facebook:

EW (Female): What a load of crap! Trust it to be a bloke that's done the study! Most women don't wear the right size, which causes problems. I couldn't do my job without one!

SSC (Male): Why is my research never as interesting as that?

AD (Female): PhD subject - the engineering of?

On Google+:

GP (Male): What a Job....

CO (Female): Never wearing bras is as likely to become the norm as never wearing high heels. 

As for the professor saying more research is needed, given he's examined over a hundred women's breasts over fifteen years, he's not likely to want to stop doing so, is he? :) The things people can get away with in the name of science...

Sidenote: it's really strange seeing my nom-de-blog rendered in capitals - I usually render it all in lower case (looks more friendly), but I've occasionally seen it in title case (Mittfh) which doesn't look too bad either...


As the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handers are in their right mind!

As I've commented...

As I've commented elsewhere... Even if what the article implies/states is legit for some... I can't see someone with F+ cups being comfortable without support. Knowing three ladies with this issue personally, this is the case. Going without HURTS. Wearing the wrong Size/shape bra also hurts.

To the claim that bra wear can increase the risk of breast cancer... That's based on the claim that pressure on the breasts increase the risk, therefore wearing a bra, which presses on the breast must increase the risk. Ignoring that the bra doesn't have to apply pressure to provide support...

Interesting commentary... I find myself agreeing with many of your points.

Annette

LOL Annette!

If pressure on the breasts increases the risk, that's gonna really play hell with sex, especially foreplay! ;-)


"Life is not measured by the breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.”
George Carlin