Read it fast, this may not be available beyond today

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Here is an interesting cartoon I found in today's paper.

This is a direct link to the strip that may be gone tomorrow.

http://www.gocomics.com/brainwaves/

You may be able to see it later by clicking on September 03 2010 in the upper right corner for a while longer.

I'm not familiar with the site, just happened across it in the Indianapolis Star online.

Why September 03 2010 showed up today, I have no idea.

Comments

Debatable.

Extravagance's picture

Are the toys for boys who like toys for girls designed for girls? Is there really a need for four different categories, or is someone just trying to prove a point?
To look at it another way: If a crossdressing man wears clothes that are obviously feminine, but specifically designed and marketed for the male body, does it still count as crossdressing? Would a T-Woman go for them as a means of expressing her true self?

Catfolk Pride.PNG

Mantyhose?

Are you saying Mantyhose wouldn't make it? :)

I could look at the comic as

I could look at the comic as a comment on what companies will do to make money. They see news coverage and blogs about allowing children to freely express mixed gender behavior through play and dress. Then the respond by creating products for what they see as a new market.

Kris

Kris

{I leave a trail of Kudos as I browse the site. Be careful where you step!}

In this case, I am glad they are/were having trouble

It’s not given to anyone to have no regrets; only to decide, through the choices we make, which regrets we’ll have,
David Weber – In Fury Born

Holly

It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.

Holly

Toys have gender?

Cute cartoon. :)

It's the same toys. It's all in the marketing...

I'm looking instead for girls for boys who like girls with toys...

Oops, did I say that out loud?

Lisa